Step Chat - a safe place where stepparents can vent
Welcome!!!


Spring is almost here...


You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



12/09/2025 1:02 am  #1


Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

https://tinybuddha.com/blog/how-to-stay-kind-without-losing-yourself-to-toxic-behavior/?fbclid=IwY2xjawOkl7FleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeUeBY2BhOVmaa0YTPenWDZKExz2Ofnrm5bIanp-03g4mbMYqTfFZG94mzmyg_aem_FlNPEJtYLxihhbijcQ4_KQ

I enjoyed this article especially part 3. "Remember you’re allowed to withdraw your kindness."

"There’s a limit to how much thanklessness you can tolerate before it starts eating you up inside. You have every right to pause or withdraw your kindness when you’re being treated poorly. This is about setting healthy boundaries. You’re not being selfish or arrogant."

I am done with ungrateful step-diablas treating me poorly. 
 


I'm loving midlife - Me+era 
 

12/09/2025 9:01 am  #2


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

Thanks for sharing this, Meera! The diablas are awful.

I also like:2. View kindness as an expression of who you are.You are kind because it’s who you are, not because you want someone else’s approval.

 

12/09/2025 10:53 am  #3


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

Aniki-Moderator wrote:

Thanks for sharing this, Meera! The diablas are awful.

I also like:2. View kindness as an expression of who you are.You are kind because it’s who you are, not because you want someone else’s approval.

Yes, I love this part too. I am a naturally kind person. I am still kind to the diablas in that I don't change who I am when they around and I don't seek revenge. I simply have removed my attention and disengaged from their drama. Then there are whispers that I "don't like them" as if that's a fault? Of course I don't like them, they're awful. 
 


I'm loving midlife - Me+era 
     Thread Starter
 

12/09/2025 10:53 am  #4


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

Thanks - interesting article.  Reciprocity was mentioned - DH was convinced by his therapist that this is not always necessary in a relationship - well, I'm afraid I disagree.  The other person has to pull, if not equal weight to me - then as near as dammit - or I am not interested in maintaining an active relationship with them any more. 

 

12/09/2025 1:52 pm  #5


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

Kes wrote:

Thanks - interesting article.  Reciprocity was mentioned - DH was convinced by his therapist that this is not always necessary in a relationship - well, I'm afraid I disagree.  The other person has to pull, if not equal weight to me - then as near as dammit - or I am not interested in maintaining an active relationship with them any more. 

Kes, I've often said that relationships should be a balance of give and take. (One exception to this is a person acting as caretaker, like when my Dad cared for my Mom due to Alzheimers.) 50/50 is nice, but not always possible. It can be 40/60, 70/30, 47/53, 90/10. Partners go through things and are not always capable of giving more. When Mr Aniki had shoulder surgery, I gave more. When I had surgery, Mr Aniki gave more. But we balance it out. Once a relationship is a constant 100% effort for one person, there is no relationship. Friendships fall under that, too. If you're doing all of the work to maintain a friendship, it's no longer a friendship. 

 

12/09/2025 3:26 pm  #6


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

Thanks for sharing the article.  

As self-delusional as this may appear, I consider myself a kind person.  That said, withdrawing kindness does not mean invoking mean.  Being reasonable and consistent is a neutral space IMHO.

The transactional reference in the article also stood out to me.  IMHO action and consequence is not transitional, it is basic math.  Doing A results in X.  Direct, clear, and related.  It is an extended mathmatical word problem.  Here are the givens.  AKA the boundaries, standards of behavior, and standards of performance.  Do the calculations, and take action. If the actions you take are compliant to the givens, the results are appropriate.  If the calculations, choices, and actions are not compliant with the givens of boundaries, behavioral standards, and performance standards, then the results are unpleasant. Repeated similar choices  

If a person behaves unreasonably, the application of a resulting consequence is not cruel.  I consider it an ultimate kindness.  Tying the consequence to the chosen behavior provides a lesson and makes the boundaries clear which is kind.  Being consistent in this is far more kind than being inconsistent.  Applying the message firmly without rancor, etc... gets far more attention than screaming, yelling, ranting, and badgering.

We had an interesting juxtaposition in our blended home while raising our son (my SS).  He much preferred my direct consistent approach to his mom's "kind" though inconsistent approach.  My parenting and disciplinary style is cause and effect related.   I parent and when appropriate I apply consequences.   As SS progressed into his teens, I phased to shifting back a bit on parenting and discipline to avoid jeopardizing the relationship that SS and I had and becoming the "evil stepdad".  BTW, I heavily considered the experiences expressed in this community in that process. 

This evolved through another evolutionary family dynamic where I took the "If you do not like how I parent and discipline, then you can step up and get it done before I have to." philosophy.

When I started shifting to a support role to my DW rather than being all in insta-parent-disciplinarian our kid took significant notice.  It was not long before he approached me with (I paraphrase)  'Dad, can you please get back to being the one who parents and disciplines me?  You do not get mad at me. You talk to me, punish me, then let me figure it out going forward, until the next time.  Mom tortures me with endless lectures, about how upset she is and hurt she is, cries, yells, and then recycles all of that endlessly long after I screwed up.'

That is the basis for my position that firm, boundary and standards-based consistency in dealing with the choices, behaviors, and consequences is kind and volatility, inconsistency, and back and forth guilt ridden crap, like Disney parenting for example, is a foundational cruelty.

Set the rules, enforce the rules, bring the pain of consequence.  Good choices deliver pleasant results. Poor choices deliver escalating abject misery.  Keep it stupid simple. That is kind.

IMHO of course.
 


If you can't listen, learn, & think, you will have to feel. -  WLR
 

12/09/2025 3:38 pm  #7


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

Kes wrote:

Thanks - interesting article.  Reciprocity was mentioned - DH was convinced by his therapist that this is not always necessary in a relationship - well, I'm afraid I disagree.  The other person has to pull, if not equal weight to me - then as near as dammit - or I am not interested in maintaining an active relationship with them any more. 

Kes, I concur with your perspective.  Equity life partnership requires.... a level of equity.  That does not mean an Excel balance sheet. It means a long horizon ebb and flow that has a flow of reciprocity and balance.

Kindess requires reciprocity.  Those who are not kind, do not earn kindness.

I am the product of a Ward and June Cleaver traditional marriage background.  Dad was the career and income earning element of their partnership, mom was the heart and soul of the partnership.   I missed the social transition away from that when I married the first time.  It looked like my XIL had it.  As it turned out, they did not.  They had a facade that covered something far different.  

My bride of 31+ years and I have our more modern version of what my parents have.  Mutual respect, absolute commitment, balanced equity, where we ebb and flow as the events of life unfold.

While that balance is fluid, it has to have reciprocity over the long term.  When that does not happen, Buh-bye, have a nice life, and good riddance.  This is extremely highlighted in blends were far too many do not set and enforce standards and for some reason the Buh-by, have a nice life, and good riddance cards are never played with Xs, ill-behaved failed family progeny, and with unworthy consistently unkind or cyclically kind partners.  For some reason being a cowering victim is seen as being kind.



IMHO of course.
 


If you can't listen, learn, & think, you will have to feel. -  WLR
 

12/09/2025 3:53 pm  #8


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

Meera wrote:

... I am still kind to the diablas in that I don't change who I am when they around and I don't seek revenge. I simply have removed my attention and disengaged from their drama. Then there are whispers that I "don't like them" as if that's a fault? Of course I don't like them, they're awful. 

Yep, this.  Absolutely this.  You are kind.  That perspective in the face of consistently noxious nastiness is the ultimate kindness.  Don't tolerate their stuff, be consistent in the setting and defending boundaries, standards, and requirements of reasonable behavior.  Kids tend to thrive in this model.  The diablas are likely the result of the absence of this kindness.


If you can't listen, learn, & think, you will have to feel. -  WLR
 

12/09/2025 7:51 pm  #9


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

I love this. I love tinybuddha! "Withdrawing kindness" is such a perfect phrase. . . .


When someone shows you who they are, believe them. 
 

12/12/2025 9:43 pm  #10


Re: Tiny Buddha How to Stay Kind Without Losing Yourself to Toxic

^^^


If you can't listen, learn, & think, you will have to feel. -  WLR
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum